Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Rob Neill's column >>

ROB NEILL

Staff
Articles Posted: 45  Links Seeded: 33
Member Since: 2/2008  Last Seen: 5/17/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Fed nears a deal to take over ailing AIG

Seeded on Tue Sep 16, 2008 7:55 PM EDT
Read ArticleArticle Source: msnbc.com
business, msnbci, stocks-economy
Seeded by Rob Neill
Advertise | AdChoices

The Federal Reserve agreed to take an 80 percent stake in AIG in exchange for an $85 billion loan, according to sources familiar with the negotiations.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • Rob Neill's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (827)
Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 20
Rob Neill

Is this the right thing for the Fed to do?

  • 6 votes
#1 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 7:55 PM EDT
Chicago-530786

Wake up America! You, the hard working Joe citizen are footing the bill for Corporations who screwed you over in the first place. Your worst nightmare has just come true America. We are in DEBT to the tune of $400 million dollars and just gave a mismanaged company $85 billion of your money. When you can't pay your gas, can't pay your groceries, can't pay your mortgage, just think to yourself that you are not important to Washington. You just bankrolled corporations that put you there. Good job to all politicians in Washington for allowing this to happen. Don't forget, things are going to get worse. I'm going to get drunk, dig a hole and stick my head in it...tell me when China takes us over.

  • 26 votes
#1.1 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:53 PM EDT
6LUKE2026

No.

  • 5 votes
#1.2 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:53 PM EDT
Bill Reed-285778

Absolutely. AIG has an internation footprint and is a victim of the young, irresponsible MBA bankers who intentionally compromised their own standards for personal profit. They built a house of cards on which the economy relied and are solely to fault for this monumental mess. They enjoyed years of big bonuses while defrauding the public and the nation. This is a systemic problem of a generation of instant gratification wiz kids and a financial system that lacked the integrity and discipline to know that someday this would come home to roost. Now, the responsible, small investors are being punished for their frivolity. 401's and IRA's are deteriorating at a time when older workers can least afford to pay for stupidity and greed of a younger generation. Shame on the American banking industry.

    #1.3 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:03 PM EDT
    BecauseIAm

    Absolutely not the right thing to do. What happened to their worries over "moral hazard"? The wringing of hands over how much work this would cause in unraveling what's connected to what else... let the market correct itself. AIG needs to have gone bankrupt and let others pick up the pieces left by the vacuum. This ends nothing, AIG will be in the same position by end of 4th quarter and the taxpayer will hold the bill for this debt and God knows how much more.

    • 8 votes
    #1.4 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:03 PM EDT
    rogeen

    Not one single story or news report that I have seen mentions even in passing the notion of seeking out and punishing the actual people who worked these shady collateralized debt packages - not one - I have seen no talk of firing or holding anyone who aggressively soild this garbage to people out of sheer avarice and disregard for duty resposible for any of this. How does that work? No names, no firings, no penalties, no accountability.

    None.

    • 15 votes
    #1.5 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:11 PM EDT
    Rich-362494

    Look, read the WSJ article to get a better understanding of this. The collapse of AIG would have rippled through the economy, not because of the insurance sector (which is segregated and maintains adequate assets to pay all claims plus a $26 billion surplus beyond the forecast claim amounts), but because of their Financial Services Division. AIG has 1 trillion in assets, but they aren't liquid. To allow a solvent company of this size to be forced into a fire sale of assets and to erode the brand name and the franchise would be governmental malpractice of the highest order. The government is loaning AIG $80 billion and is obtaining the right to buy 80 % of the company at a preagreed price if AIG defaults on the loan. Supposedly, the warrants are structured to encourage the speedy shedding of assets, something that AIG wants to do, but without the sword of bankruptcy hanging over their head. Provided AIG is not misrepresenting their asset structure or the potential for further deterioration, this should work out fine for the taxpayer and for the shareholders of AIG. The policyholders will be fine under any scenario. In a perfect world, AIG sells $80 - $100 billion of assets, pays the loan back in short order and the warrants expire unexercised. Then, AIG can manage their company without the so-called free market forcing a spiral that results in the equivalent of a run on the bank - a collateral call.

    • 3 votes
    #1.6 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:12 PM EDT
    jbdaad

    Noooooooooooooo!!!!

    • 2 votes
    #1.7 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:29 PM EDT
    Carl H

    This is complete and utter bull@!$%#. Bush is doing everything he can to cover his cronies in the last 4 months of his administration.

    • 4 votes
    #1.8 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:33 PM EDT
    Arkansas mom

    Thank you for the factual information. Everyone is understandably upset about all our country's problems, but it would be helpful if we understood some of the concepts involved instead of just going with our gut reactions to headlines.

    • 1 vote
    #1.9 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:43 PM EDT
    Kate!

    Earlier today I was proud of the government for staying out of this mess. Now, I learn that in actuality they've done the very thing I was glad they hadn't! I'm disappointed, angry, and tired of footing the bill, as a taxpayer, for the reckless. How many MORE companies will our government "save"? These banks and investment corporations, etc (anyone involved in any way, shape or form in the sub-prime mess) needed to learn a lesson: engage in reckless business practices (usually in the name of a quick buck) and do it at your own risk, with no government safety net. This situation is like a drug abusing teen with a couple of enablers for parents. The parents make excuses, scrape the kid up off the ground, promise he'll learn his lesson, and then the whole mess repeats again. If the government keeps bailing these idiots out, nothing will stop this cycle from happening again somewhere down the road. There will be no reason for corporations to think twice- why worry, the government will bail us out. This is not the way America works. So the collapse of AIG could have made the economy even worse, and have affected lots of other areas of the financial world. So what. We would eventually have recovered, and been better off for it, with less national debt, a more secure future, and (hopefully) a smarter more sound financial sector. Instead, in what has become trademarked behavior by our government, another band-aid was applied to an oozing wound, with the decision-makers hoping that it will hold until the whole mess becomes someone else's problem. Shame on the financial sector, shame on our government, and shame on anyone who is profiting from this mess.

    • 5 votes
    #1.10 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:49 PM EDT
    momof2-530954

    you said it chicago....

    • 1 vote
    #1.11 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:53 PM EDT
    JK from PA

    Do we have a choice? "Tax and spend Democrats", my @ss. The Repubs deregulated the system and we have this to thank for it.

    "Tax and piss our money away, and borrow from China on credit, Republicans"

    These traitors are selling off our nation for their greedy cronies, AT OUR EXPENSE!!

    If you vote for McCain\Palin, you deserve to lose your job, lose your home, and watch your family suffer without healthcare.

    • 7 votes
    #1.12 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:54 PM EDT
    Stephen-530962

    Hell No it's not a good for anyone! the "Feds" are playing with America's money. Bush makes a speech in Texas asking Americans to dig deep and donate to help the people of Texas. Then on the other hand he O.K.'s a plan to fork out $85 Billion to a corrupt entity to keep the economy afloat. Where the hell is the money that was given to them by customers? Fancy homes in Europe? Private islands in the Pacific? Good grief America.... why do you allow this to happen time and again? the filthy rich rip you off the first time, waste your money and then the Feds take your tax money to keep the sinking ship above water. It's all beyond comprehension. Will it not end? The feds can pick and choose who receives salvation and a free meal ticket? I don't see anyone giving me a break, paying my way or making me have a easy ride. I'm ashamed to be part of this even being under protest. We are at the mercy of the real people who own and run this country like some kids board game. Joe America needs to say enough is enough and stop the madness. There is strength in numbers!

    • 5 votes
    #1.13 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:55 PM EDT
    Wilfred of Ivanhoe

    This is absolutely ridiculous! Corporate welfare at its worst.

    • 5 votes
    #1.14 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:01 PM EDT
    BEV_OKC_CITIZEN

    I've read the fine print and inquired financial investers and they (our present political leaders and these companies) know exactly what they are doing. They have known about their certain demise for awhile now and opted not to do anything until the debt became so big they backed the Feds (buddies) into a corner.
    My analogy is this ....
    A very dear loved one was hit by a car, died and left his 4 kids penniless, because he was 40 years old and didn't have a Living Will; this was back in the 70's.

    The thug that hit him (which we all believed was intentional) moved all his assets and liquidable accounts into his mothers name, so the courts would not force him to liquidate.
    He was quite wealthy and knew people (unethical business personnel) that helped him move his funds. The beneficiaries, grieving children with no mother, were all under the age of 17 and after 4 yrs of probate court hearings received a mere $1,200 each.

    I truly believe Fannie/Freddie/AIG/ WorldCom/Enron and others sure to follow, commit the same unethical acts; behind the scenes and stashing their monies in other accounts, while everyone even our country suffers. I would not be one bit surprised!!!!!

    NO MORE BIG BUSINESS OR LOBBYISTS WORKING FOR BIG BIZ!!! We, the people, must find a way to make them more accountable and more transparent. I just wished we had started earlier...it's time to own up America...find the fight in you.
    MOVE...DO SOMETHING...WRITE YOUR CONGRESSMAN...WRITE ARTICLES AND POST THEM...SHARE YOUR VOICE AS FAR AS YOUR VOICE WILL TAKE YOU!!!!!

    • 4 votes
    #1.15 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:04 PM EDT
    Rick-531065

    How can we trust a company like AIG with $85 Billion Dollars of the Tax Payers dollars when they cannot be trusted with their own money and the monies of their investors?

    The collapse of AIG would have an adverse effect on the Economy, but it would be limited. Other Insurance Companies and Financial Institutions are still operating and not under the threat of Bankruptcy! They would pick up the business and minimize the fall-out!! And as their Business grows they would hire the employees from AIG!!!

    By the way who loaned the Federal Government the money to loan AIG? Another Foreign Country bail-out? Do I have to look forward to an International Social (in)Security Card?

    One response cited that AIG has time to re-structure and right the ship and the Federal Government having the "possibility" of acquiring 80% of AIG's assets. What if their are no assets left? That equals 100% of nothing!

    Our own Government wont release funds to assist the American Taxpayer with their Housing woes or basic cost of living but they have the audacity to pull something like this?!? Why am I not surprised!!

    • 2 votes
    #1.16 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:39 PM EDT
    Arthur-379160

    No, and hell no. Waste of tax payer money. Let those a-holes go under. AIG management is a bunch of welfare whores. Proud of yourselves, hey. Choke on it.

    It is time to eliminate the Fed.

    • 1 vote
    #1.17 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:43 PM EDT
    Socialist Monopoly

    The FED , by law, is the one responsible for making sure entities are not delving out risky loans. I don't think they did a good job in this area. Let's CHANGE this problem NOW. And remember the "Savings and Loan" scandal of the 80's? Or how about the risky Wall Street loans called in just before the GREAT DEPRESSION???? Sound familiar?

    • 2 votes
    #1.18 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:59 PM EDT
    Godiswatching

    ha! they can't even run the house and senate much less a corporation of which they are now 80% proud owners ... with MY TAX MONEY. A failing corp. at that.
    Let them all hang themselves, its been a long time coming. Stupid execs without the brain power of a squirrel. All those loans and things will still have to be paid back by the legitimate owners - no sweat there. The ones who were only renting will leave the corp. holding the empty bag.

      #1.19 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 11:52 PM EDT
      Clifford Brown

      WHAT BALLS!!!
      Ten years ago, I switched from Republican to an Independent. Would you believe the letter I got
      today! "Personal" from John McCain, saying "My friend, we need to raise 10 billion dollars, and
      we know we can count on you for a donation of -- get this! -- a thousand, 500, or 250 dollars.

      I quit these bastards ten years ago. They dug out the old registrations and have the "nads" to ask ME for money,-- they are the ones that just cost me 23 thousand dollars in common stock, I
      lost when they took over Fan/Fred. They cancelled ALL the common stock held by individual
      investors and shored up the stock of the corporations so the Feds could have 80% of the
      groups stocks. The 200 billion dollars used is NOT Taxpayer money, it is borrowed from CHINA ----so China now will OWN 80% of all the houses in the United States with mortgages!! I guess they just add this cost to the loan from China.

      BUSH, CHENEY, GRAMM AND NOW McCAIN HAVE BROUGHT THE COUNTRY TO IT'S KNEES!!
      We' re supposed to be thankful for this???

      The PALIN PARTY can go to Hell!

      • 6 votes
      #1.20 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:57 AM EDT
      John Gayle

      The Fed needs to stick to its basic fundamental charter and leave ALL of Wall Street to survive or fail. It is not the responsibility of taxpayers to assume the liabilities of private industries bad judgement or miscalculation. Whatever happen to Wall Street's sense of assuming responsibility (total) for its successes and failures and not ask taxpayers to assume liabilities associated with Wall Streets lack of good judgement. I guess we all understand the 'true' definition of 'free enterprize' system. If you fail don't worry, the average taxpayers will guarantee your loan and underwrite your failures. Business will never have to assume responsibility for its failures. Just forward the excess liabilities to the taxpayers. I am in disbelief when Wall Street decries 'any oversight' and then abuses its employees, the public and regulators with 'lack of total and clear transparency' and robs the train and gets off and then leaves the run away train to the public to prevent the oncoming train wreck. I wonder how all of these so called 'capitalists' would say to their Grandmothers when explaining their fundamental breaking of the basic rules of right, wrong and fairness. Would they be 'totally' honest with their Grandmother's or would their Grandmother wash their mouths out with soap because they did not do the 'right and ethically correct thing'. Perhaps I am naive, but we are leaving a very sad example for our children and not to respect towards our Grandparents memory. Most children/adults misrepresent the truth to their Grandparents. We have gotten so caught up in creating imaginery wealth with smoking mirrors that we have truly lost our morale compass. So, when you see your children follow your example don't be surprised.............just look in the mirror and tell your Grandparents how 'proud you are' on passing along their fine qualities. Oh, by the way, I have yet to see a hurst pulling a U Haul so you can't take it with you................but your children are truly your only legacy.........I hope we are all proud. We are setting a wonderful example for our children, our nation and the world.....and we are wondering why we aren't respected. Hey, if we can't make the mental jump on that question we are seriously disconnected. Trust has to be earned by children to parent and from parent to the child and among nations. We aren't setting any example to be respected anywhere on any planet within any solar system. We are caught up in degrees of correct or rightness as if not getting 'caught' with our hand in the cookie jar is somehow to be respected as an achievement as if 'we beat the system'.............hey, the system is us and we are just injuring a family member and what accomplishment is that. Perhaps its an achieve in kindagarden, but not as a grownup. Yes, I am frustrated, but more disappointed. You aren't ever a little bite pregnant you either are or you aren't. There are not degrees of pregnancy and there are not degrees of right and wrong. Past President Clinton may not understand the definition of what 'it is', but everyone else on the planet does. Anyway, trust is earned day after day, hour after hour, minute after minute. If you are elected or appointed to a position of public trust then I would hope that you would truly understand the responsibilities they go along with that charge. To be fair and balanced to all and TOTALLY OPEN AND TRANSPARENT and if you can't sell the idea to your Grandmother then if is pro bably a very bad idea................and trust me..............she will tell you the truth when no one else will..............and why, but she honestly loves you and cares. So, let's care about this country and allow the capitalistic system to succeed or fail based on the risk factor. The higher the risk the greater the reward or loss...............but it is not the business of the average taxpayer to underwrite success............that is a violation of America's Charter. What businesses were bailed out, a bridge to far provided, or some other government guarantee provided? What has changed? I would suggest that you have a few 'special' interest personalities or interest groups that are being protected and who will benefit from the public bailing them out. They will become wealthier at the expense of others underwriting their bad judgement. No one person or company or country should be protected from failure. You can't protect people or companies or countries from themselves. It is time for some 'hard' love so let's be honest with ourselves and everyone else and set an example that our children and Grandparents can be proud of. Let's be totally transparent in all aspects of business and government. Let's call it straight up and straight down. Americans can handle the truth and the truth has been in very short supply lately. And if we don't ask the question we will never know the answer. Hold all public officials accountable..........elected or appointed and REQUIRE TOTAL TRANSPARENCY of all of Wall Streets transactions. No one is interested in investing in America because they do not know what the truth.........total truth of our balance sheets are. It seems we have a second set of books..........off balance sheet liabilities. You know the old saying..........figures don't lie, but liars can figure. Let's get away from degrees of correctness and pretending that we are only a 'little bit' pregnant. AIG bailout was a terrible mistake and should have been left to fail. If Warren Buffett was interested and he understands that industry totally and other banking institutions were not interested then why would the American taxpayer be interested or have I just missed something. Get a grip and take a long step back. Thank you for listening. By the way, my very Best to your Grandmother and her memory.

      • 1 vote
      #1.21 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:06 AM EDT
      katelyn

      I'm no expert on global finance but something tells me if AIG goes bankrupt - a company that has 1.3 trillion assets in 130 countries - its ramifications would be too huge for the world to handle.

      The bright side of this is, contrary to many people's belief, that this country still rules. We sneeze, the world gets pneumonia.

        #1.22 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:58 AM EDT
        Americans are dim witted

        This forum demonstrates why the average American should not be allowed to vote. 95% of the responses say let AIG fail. How utterly stupid can you people be. Lets crash the entire US financial services industry because of a couple of greedy CEOs. That's fine go after the CEO's but really do you want to put the country into recession because you are mad at a handful of people. It is disgusting and so typical to blame large companies when there are millions of guilty parties. It is true that the investment banks were allowed to leverage their money to unsustainable levels and that regulation needs to be in place to correct it from occuring again. But the loss of hundreds of billions in stock value hit the investors in these companies, pension funds, iras, etc.

        Did you forget the millions who bought houses they couldn't afford. Did you forget that congress specifically mandated looser guidelines so more minorities could get those unsustainable high interest rate subprime mortgages? It's pretty simple, Fannie, Freddie, AIG, and Bear Stearns would have had fatal consequences in the US economy and worldwide economy. Lehman will be tramatic but a demonstration that unless you are big enough to wreak havoc on the economy you are not going to be helped out. By the way, the $85 billion is a loan not a gift. It is going to be another year before we find out what the cost is, if anything, of the actions with the aforementioned companies. The shareholders of all of those companies have lost almost their entire investments.

        The steps that are being taken will hopefully stem the downward spiral we are in.

        • 2 votes
        #1.23 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:43 AM EDT
        Eli-502143

        Rob Neil,

        It is NOT the right thing to do! Government should Not Bail Out Private Companies. We have Markets to take care of these Issues. Government is NOT to burden the Tax payers with Bad Management of Companies who practice voodoo economics. Time will tell if his band-aid is holding.

        Bad move Bernanke, just a bad move! The loser in this game is the tax payer.

        • 1 vote
        #1.24 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 4:09 AM EDT
        Dick-283201

        Not No, but H##l No. Why have there been no indictments on these abortions. CEO' running companies into the ground, my tax dollars bailing them out. Then Obscene golden parachutes to the miserable bottom dwelling criminals in charge. This is one life long registered republican who will never vote republican again.

        • 1 vote
        #1.25 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 5:03 AM EDT
        Greg-385716

        Hello all. I have read almost all of the comments posted and I'm sad about how everyone is reacting. Lets fight amongst ourselves because we are a republican or a democrat. Lets point the fingers at the current administration. Lets get pissed off at the corporate heads who went after the $$. What's really sad is that everyone thinks they have the answer to this problem when it's not a single instance requiring a single solution. Politics won't solve this no matter who you vote for. You all want to point the finger at someone else or say that your party nominee will fix it. Where did this mentality come from?? Does anyone dare say that WE THE PEOPLE have done this to ourselves? Our own greed, pride and sloth has done this. People talk of trickle down economics and policies. Well, what is happening right now is exactly the opposite. WE CREATED THIS MESS. NOT THE POLITICIANS, NOT THE CEO'S. We wanted that house, that car, that boat that we had to borrow money to buy, knowing it was a risky loan but were sure we could pay it off before the rate adjusted. And we could have paid it off, but guess what, - we got comfortable with our new found lifestyle and posessions - forgetting about that never sleeping interest rate. WE DID THIS. These companies only did what WE wanted them to do. Be aggressive, go after it, take a risk, loosen up guidelines and restrictions to help out the have nots. Now, when the mess we have created is being put back onto U.S. you are complaining??! You call for accountability - you call for responsibility - you call for change. Well my friends, WE ARE CALLING OURSELVES TO THE JUDGMENT BAR for WE made this mess. This whole 'entitlement' mentality doesn't work. This too proud to work for pennies doesn't work. The attitude of blaming someone or something else for our troubles doesn't work. WE are only accountable to ourselves and God and We have dug this whole.

        I can say this because I have an MBA, I'm a licensed securities broker, real estate agent and loan officer. I also know what it's like to start and run a business. As a financial services representitive, I have seen more laziness and pride in the same people who have created their own problems and now want someone to help bail them out or make it easier for them to dig their way out. Life doesn't work that way my friends. This is a mess WE (I am an American too - but given my background, don't have the same worries/concerns and political views as most of you commenting) have created. I have been smart with my investing, buying and counsel I have given to clients. I can't force them to take my advice nor will I protect them from the consequences of poor decisions. So my friends, there are those like me who don't want to 'BAIL OUT' messes we didn't help create - just as you feel is happening here. Some of you are complaining that the FED isn't helping you out. Well, by loaning this money, by taking Fannie and Freddie under it's supervision, they are trying to do just that - BAIL US OUT. If you think you home has lost value now, just think if these institutions were allowed to go under. Your home would be worth NOTHING, yet you would still be liable for the mortgage - TO A FOREIGN BANK who bought it up and I'm pretty sure, China and Russia and Korea would love to own your home. Talk about invasion and taking over the US. They could do it without EVER firing a shot. We Americans love out freedoms and our guns so we would shoot at them, but wouldn't have any means to build, or buy more weapons. You think this is extreem talk?? Then WE are more nieve than I thought.

        The next time you want to point fingers at other people and institutions, first think about what it takes to get to this point in time and ask yourself, did you do anything to promote or prevent this? 99% of us would say no. 99% of us are wrong. If you can't be responsible with your debts and obligations, if you can't be an American and not depend on someone else for your job, income, food, fuel, - if you can't pick yourself up, brush off the dirt and get to work - putting your own house in order, then thank people who are helping do it for you - people like me, who pay a lot in taxes, who employ people, who create jobs, and who try to teach good financial and ethical principals. With this ME mentality I'm reading - if you want me to do the same then I'll say - when are you going to listen to people like me and stob shooting yourself in the foot???!!! Stop taking my money, my sweat, my time away from family and my guilty pleasures to fix everyone's mistakes!!! I am and American. And as an American, I will stand, fight, and fall if need be to make America great. We are only as strong as the weakest among us.

        Stop fighting and get to work. AND might I suggest studying the rise and fall of the Roman empire. History repeats itself.

        • 2 votes
        #1.26 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 5:17 AM EDT
        Tad-401841

        What happens if AIG still tanks after receiving the $85B? Do we give them an additional $85B or more and at what point does the bail out stop? This is only the beginning of large institutional failures as there will be more coming anyway.

        This loan to AIG is just as risky as the high risk mortgage securities AIG is holding, it's the equivalent of giving a huge loan to a high risk home buyer that is in deep financial trouble.
        What sense does that make? It seems that these bailouts are just perpetuating what actually started this mortgage crisis which is more bad loans, this time by government and with our tax dollars.

        There no is doubt there will be repercussions if AIG was allowed to fail but who stands to gain the most from this bailout is the real question and concern. It's difficult to believe that the average person will benefit the most from this high risk "loan."

        • 1 vote
        #1.27 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 5:58 AM EDT
        Dwight-393210

        Well the taxpayer gets hit again and the rich keep getting richer. Where is this money comming from China or Japan? The US doesn't have any. The most sesible thing I've seen so far is the Chairman of Mac & Mae not getting their seperation bonus, course that's probably in their contract so in the end they will probably get it anyway.

        • 1 vote
        #1.28 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 6:05 AM EDT
        C-531617

        Wake up people the Federal Reserve Bank is a private bank, not the goverment. You need to know about your money check it out. Half of you probably still think your money is backed by gold.

        • 2 votes
        #1.29 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 6:16 AM EDT
        james-531618

        The article states "the U.S. government agreed Tuesday to provide an $85 billion emergency loan to rescue the huge insurer AIG" Since when is the FEd the US government - it is a private banking institution - a mafia like organization that has a printing press and the right to print up money based on nothing, and lend it out for interest. Since all the loans cant be paid back, they print more and more money deflating the dollar, and worsening everyones' lives.

        • 2 votes
        #1.30 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 6:20 AM EDT
        Tad-401841

        Wake up people the Federal Reserve Bank is a private bank, not the government. You need to know about your money check it out. Half of you probably still think your money is backed by gold

        .

        You mean our dollars are not fully backed by gold reserves! Wow, that a was a very enlightening remark.

        You mean the Feds are printing money that has no gold and silver backing and lending it to other banks and institutions, double wow! I wonder if that's going to affect the value of the dollar as more are printed causing an inflationary effect decreasing our purchasing power.

        Do you think that have the same effect as using inflated taxpayer dollars to pay for bailouts? Whats the difference, both taxpayer dollars and Federal Reserve Notes are printed on the same press. it just ends up in different places for different reasons. It's still notes of "faith and credit" unfortunately with no intrinsic backing.

        • 1 vote
        #1.31 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 6:55 AM EDT
        Kent McMillen

        I am not knowledgeable as to the necessity to bail out AIG, but I ask if they are worthy of help, why are the millions of homeowners who were victimized by predatory lenders not worthy of help? This program to help borrowers, that is moving into place now, will only help a few, and it is taking months. Why can't it move with the speed of the Bear Stearns and AIG rescue? Check John McCain's brain trust, and you will find lobbyists...the people who brought us this mess!! Is not the republican platform "Every tub sits on its own bottom"? It was at one time, before they switched to "corporate welfare"!

        • 1 vote
        #1.32 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 7:01 AM EDT
        Alan-3898

        It appears the only one who has any intelligence in these posted comments is Greg_385716. Wake up America and quit pointing the finger at the current or past presidents or the various party affiliations. It is all politicians who created our problems whether Republican, Democrat or Independent from the local level all the way up to our congress. They spew out the same crap every election year and we fall for it and we vote them in. The solution for Americas problems is placing term limits on all politicians to keep the bums out from feathering their beds and letting their cronies too deep into the taxpayers pockets. Forget about the bailout of AIG which is an American Corporation. I don't see anyone complaining to congress about the annually wasted millions of our tax dollars that we give out to foreign nations and their politicians who piss it away only to be criticized by their people and our way of life. Get a brain America and quit flapping your lips via e-mail at what president and/or political party is at fault. They all are.

          #1.33 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 7:49 AM EDT
          Kenny-531766

          I have my life insurance through this company. I cannot replace this insurance at the same price, i would cost me double the price. Stop to think how many people would be in the same position. this is a nessasary bail out like it or not

            #1.34 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:19 AM EDT
            Jimbo-427103

            Well said Greg - and your absolutely correct in all your opinions on the matter.. i think that what has people boiling over is that the tops exec's of these companies manage to "award" themselves huge bonuses and severance packages that guarentee that they cna live like visiting royalty for the rest of thier natural lives.. The other part is that these top eexec's have committed crimes in thier positions (see ENRON) yet if anything ever happens to them in the criminal justice system it is less then a slap on the wrist..

            Most people see a problem with a system where a kid with a knife robs a Seven Eleven of $200.00 and he gets senrenced to five years in a medium custody prison.. A business exec robs ratepayers / consumers of millions using a pen and a computer and might get sentenced to a few months at Eglin AFB federal prison - literally a country club.. Of course the exec gets to keep the ill gained millions that he or the board awarded him..

              #1.35 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:30 AM EDT
              Brian-531678

              Welcome to UCSA AKA United Communist States of America. in a Communist government the Country owns big companies ,and anything over 50% is OWN .So do all AIG employees become Government employees now? Who gets the profits? Can I go to share holders meetings since we all are the government? Is the board and CEO go to voted in by the people that own that company now ?When can the government start buying companies like GE,State Farm , TVA , if the government go to buy companies why not the ones making big profits instead of ones going broke ? is it not best for the people to have profitable? WHO anybody buy stock in a company that is going broke ????WE THE PEOPLE just did !!!!

              • 1 vote
              #1.36 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:39 AM EDT
              basil-531807

              I agree partly with with Rich's breakdown; this should not be a big deal IF they can liquidate and repay the government. AIG has been a mess since CEO Greensberg got busted for embezzling...I also agree it seems to be no end in sight, I'm reading that the American Auto industry wants a buy out too! What's next - Walmart & Target have poor Christmas sales so we float them $25-50 billion too? Where's my bail out at the gas pumps?

              The management of these companies gets turned out by the government, but they get to take their golden parachutes on the way out. I don't believe the government should regulate these companies any closer, it is up to the boards not to reward these knuckleheads when they drive their companies into the ground, but they aren't going to do that either. I'm not sure what the answer is, but I burns my grits just thinking about it. I have already written Speaker Pelosi and both of my state representatives to tell them what I think about this, I encourage everyone else to do the same. I will have a stroke if we "bail out" Detroit automakers!!!!!!

                #1.37 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:47 AM EDT
                John Hendrick

                Naturally the current administration cannot allow this kind of failure on it's watch, most especially during the run up to the Presidential election. As many of the responders have noted, the average tax payer had nothing what so ever to do with the poor business decisions, facilitated primarily by corporate greed and allowed to occur under the wayward eye of the current administration, which have led Fannie, Freddie and now AIG into such poor financial conditions.

                Yet, we (you, me, your parents, siblings, cousins, neighbors) the everyday citizen who is already struggling under the increases in fuel, food, housing and medical care...will now be charged with retiring the debt of these firms, through the actions of the current administration to shore up these firms, lest we have some kind of "catostrophic melt down".

                I say let them fail. I say recover the enourmous bonuses paid to CFO's, CEO's and the like, who falied in their duty to run a financially sound firm. The private sector should remain just that. This is just another disgusting piece of the puzzle created during the last 8 years.

                  #1.38 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:24 AM EDT
                  MovingToEurope

                  Two questions...who is going to jail from Freddie, Fannie & AIG? Heads need to roll! And, will we elect another know-nothing Dictator, who spends billions of our dollars a month to fight a war we cannot win, to bury our country for the next 4 years?

                    #1.39 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:09 AM EDT
                    Daryl-532398

                    I agree, the Feds should stay out of this. When AIG was making record profits in the insurance business was any of that equity shared with the taxpayers....I think not. Let AIG deal with its own issues and let the chips fall where they may. What would the employees of Enron think of a bailout of this company but not theirs. They lost everything too.

                      #1.40 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:39 AM EDT
                      bylou

                      Enough corporate welfare. The root of the problem is the housing market, and of course the government can't figure a way to bail out the homeowners. Well how about instead of bailing out huge corporations that speculate day to day and futures making money day to day based on the land under our homes and all the interest they gauged out of the homeowners, the government would have not bailed out fanny and freddie, but instead made them lower the interest rates on all the bad mortgage loans the mortgages at the lower rate, does everyone realize that the Federal Reserve is a private corporation run buy bankers and not part of the Federal government. Maybe it's time we took back our money.

                        #1.41 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:40 AM EDT
                        Bertfw

                        To Rich-362494, I just don't think you see the bigger picture. Yes, liquidating assets at fire-sale prices as you mention would be bad, but what you're not seeing is AIG shouldn't have gambled themselves into this kind of situation in the first place. Additionally, I don't pay my taxes in order for some corporation to maintain value in it's brand name - if these corporations can't maintain value on their own, then they don't deserve to have any value associated with their name.

                        If I go to Vegas and end up $100K in the hole, do I get a government bailout? That's what's happening here. Instead of bailing out AIG the feds should spend that money on laws and regulations that treat the stock market as a casino, because that's all it is and has been for decades.

                          #1.42 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:47 AM EDT
                          C. M. Carlen

                          All of the CEOs, CFOs, COOs, etc. of the failed financial companys should and must be held totally responsible for their greed and corrupt behavior. To begin with seize all their assets and "golden parachutes" to help defray the expense of bailing out the company.

                          Why should the U.S. Taxpayer foot the bill to let these characters live the life of luxury? The company heads expect retirees to live on Social Security, therefore if it is good enough for American citizens then it is good enough for them! I would also recommend prison time or hard labor in a community service, as a wake up call to the other "speculators" expecting a bail-out from the government.

                          In regards to AIG, yes it is important to protect the people holding insurance policies but not the executives nor key managers that allowed this to happen. The FBI needs to do a full scale investigation on this one!

                            #1.43 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:56 AM EDT
                            Florida_kes

                            Lets crash the entire US financial services industry because of a couple of greedy CEOs

                            It should crash because the entire industry is nothing but a house of cards that benefits no one but the top 1%. Propping it up via a "loan" isn't going to fix anything but delay the inevitable because it's a lot more than just a couple of greedy CEOs....it's the ENTIRE SYSTEM.

                              #1.44 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 11:09 AM EDT
                              MaxxClark

                              Absolutely Not the Right thing to do! We are allowing those who have believed themselves to be "entitled" and above reproach, to the protection and bailout of tax dollars, paid by honest, hard-working Americans. Americans that will never receive the same protection and bailout for their personal financial losses, generated by those who felt entitled to steal, lie, cheat, and prop-up bogus financial dealings that would not pass the "sniff test" ---!

                                #1.45 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 11:59 AM EDT
                                UDbmas

                                I have mixed feelings about the AIG Fed loan. I don't like bailing out bloated corporations who overpay their CEO even, and especially, when those CEOs make bad decisions that undermine the viability of the market. That said, AIG is very much involved in money market funds which, since 1994, have supposedly been a safe-haven for those who prefer less risk over high yield. I moved most of my 401K out of stocks into MMF after my retirement lost 6K. Having heard that money markets were "safe as houses" for investment, I guess it is apropos that since the housing sector is down, there go the houses...and the MMF.

                                • 1 vote
                                #1.46 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:42 PM EDT
                                Shan-man

                                NO EFFEN WAY!

                                These EFFEN insurance companies love to gloat when they have huge positive margins, so where is all that margin now?

                                This is a WIN/WIN for AIG, they can't ever lose money! Why the HELL NOT?!

                                These firms get paid premiums for years and years and years, but they have nothing to pay out when something happens! AND THEN they try their damnest to get rid of the "Risky" policies, even if you've NEVER filed a EFFEN claim!

                                As is the case here in RI, many INS Co's are trying to pull out of the state on speculation that the ODDs are that we are due sometime for a major Hurricane. My insurance company sent an inspector to my home, when I had Never filed any claims and were threatening to cancel my poicy over items that they find wrong with my house NOW, but NOT 4 years ago when I bought it! SAME EXACT house that I bought and in the same condition if NOT BETTER!

                                Other friends of mine had thier 25 year old policy cancelled after they filed one claim for smoke damage. The company paid them about 10% of what they had paid into their company (NOT including any interest that they had earned).

                                HOW is that RIGHT?!

                                Now we the Tax payer have "agreed" to pay $85B for a failing "I DON'T GIVE A CRAP" Insurance Conglomerate? Why?

                                I want to see the list of every YEAH vote on that one!

                                I'm giving everyone I can the BIG BOOT in this election & WILL continue to do so until the BUNCH gets it right!

                                  #1.47 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:48 PM EDT
                                  steve-532811

                                  We should thak our congress and senitors. piss ass bush for bailing out all the rich fat cats. they dont give a @!$%# about the lower class of people. i'm talking about the people that just makes $20.00 to $50.00 a year. now do they give a @!$%# about the retired people who is on social security. i guess since they have giveing all the far cat andf rich people everything, there want be anything for the retired people again this coming year.

                                    #1.48 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:50 PM EDT
                                    Tad-401841

                                    This $85B bailout of AIG is costing each individual taxpayer approximately $283. Those who have insurance policies with AIG are basically being subsidized by others who don't.

                                    The so called loan and its repayment at a later time will be with inflated dollars worth less than the original loan along with the interest being paid on it. This is assuming that the AIG doesn't fail before repaying that loan.

                                    Rewarding bad behavior by mega corporations may do even more damage to our economy and encouraging the same behavior by others.

                                      #1.49 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:16 PM EDT
                                      Voter-in-LA

                                      To C.M.Carlen:

                                      Do some research, back on February 2nd 2006, 4 top executives from AIG were indicted by a Grand Jury. Also still being investigated at the time was Greenberg who was ultimately forced to retire. Anyone in the insurance industry with some smarts could see this coming a mile away.

                                        #1.50 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 4:03 PM EDT
                                        thompsonhomes

                                        I find it amazing how the rich are always given an out. Even if they screw up. The poor and the middle class loose everything if they screw up. No government bailout, and no get out of jail free card with a golden parachut. Now the Federal government is on the hook for 600 billion dollars, thats costing us approximately $7500 for every household this year alone. That doesn't include the already bloated corporate welfare included in the national budget.

                                          #1.51 - Thu Sep 18, 2008 8:22 AM EDT
                                          logdump

                                          All of the charges against Greenberg were dropped and the Spitzer filed civil suits against him 6 in all then dropped 2 of those. Greenberg has a history of being looked at. Also his son was ceo of MMC and was ousted. That being said he was a super CEO at Aig. He also appears on Charlie Rose and gave his side of the situation. His take that AIG could be solvent on its own in the private sector.
                                          Watch his interview here it is really interesting: http://www.charlierose.com/guests/hank-greenberg

                                            #1.52 - Thu Sep 18, 2008 8:37 AM EDT
                                            rxrj

                                            The Federal Reserve is not apart of the U.S. Government. President Kennedy tried to bring the U.S. Currency back under the Government but, did not live to see it carried out. It is privately run are should I say tied into the World Banks. Have you heard of the Amero (Money)? Goggle Amero and read up. Have you heard of the North American Union? Goggle that one too. I believe we have been put into a controlled crash. The Dollar is suppose to be replaced in 2010 according to what I have read in the pass. Do some research and you maybe surprised at what you find on these two subjects. The middle class tax cuts we have been hearing about will come, because there will be no middle class. The cutting of jobs because of the companies sending their equipment to other country will stop. Because with open borders under the North American Union the people in Mexico and Canada can come here and work. By the way you can go to their countries and work too. Also 3/4 of AIG's debt is owed to over seas banks. Yes people we bailed out China, Russia, and Germany just to name a few. It is bargaining to look like we have reach that place up the creek were we don't have that paddle.

                                            • 1 vote
                                            #1.53 - Thu Sep 18, 2008 9:16 AM EDT
                                            rxrj

                                            I said, the Federal Reserve is not a part of the US Government. I should have said it "is" but, President Kennedy wanted to put the money control back under the U.S Treasury.

                                              #1.54 - Thu Sep 18, 2008 9:17 PM EDT
                                              DFergy

                                              Every one should think back to the bailout of Chrysler in the 80's. The govt backed a bailout and within a very short time the loans were paid and the taxpayers no worse for wear. The company is still profitable to this day by our govt supporting our business. Yes, there were some big mistakes made by these mortgage companies and banks, but Aig for example, if given time to liquefy millions of dollars of assets they still have, the loans can be paid back sooner than deadlines stipulated for repayment. The company will still be strong, our economy strong and the taxpayers no worse for wear not having lost a thing. This is smart business to help our companies and our economy.

                                                #1.55 - Fri Sep 19, 2008 2:40 PM EDT
                                                Socrates1

                                                Yes, and how did the bailout of Chrysler help Ford and GM, at the time their solvent competitors.

                                                  #1.56 - Fri Sep 19, 2008 9:35 PM EDT
                                                  Reply
                                                  had enough-352798

                                                  The Feds move is our taxpayer money at work.

                                                  • 3 votes
                                                  Reply#2 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:01 PM EDT
                                                  schwannomin

                                                  The lesson to be learned here is if you're going to do shady deals, you had better be so big and do shady deals with so many people that the government cannot allow you to fail lest you take down the entire economy.

                                                  The individual homeowner is not big enough to warrant a gov't bailout. Lehman Bros. wasn't even big enough. AIG spread their assets to so many other people that the taxpayer had to bail them out.

                                                  Please, Americans, PLEASE give us a change in the white house!

                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  #2.1 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:08 AM EDT
                                                  Shan-man

                                                  Nothing like a little competition, Huh!

                                                  OH, there isn't any!

                                                    #2.2 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:49 PM EDT
                                                    Reply
                                                    New Yorker 2000Deleted
                                                    jade-530684

                                                    This is completely out-of-hand, I hope someone files a lawsuit to stop this sort of pandering,

                                                    Nothing but a paycheck for PIMCO

                                                    Paulson should be arrested

                                                    Loan my a**

                                                    • 6 votes
                                                    Reply#4 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:07 PM EDT
                                                    flyover-530687

                                                    This is the same big businees that has seen to it that personal bankruptcy is all but impossible; the same government that has refused to lift a finger for those losing their homes, the same political party that screams, "free market! free market!" whenever it smells even the hint of regulation. Yes, here they all are, running to the tax payer to bail them out.
                                                    Pathetic.

                                                    • 13 votes
                                                    Reply#5 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:09 PM EDT
                                                    Canada48

                                                    Totally agree!! They firmly believe in "Free market" and hate all regulations and oversight by people who can be thrown out at the next election. They are driven by greed and short-term profits and balance sheet standings. And when they themselves prove that this does not work, then they go to Joe Public for money! Will there be any overisght by elected officials of the financial world after this?

                                                    • 5 votes
                                                    #5.1 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:50 PM EDT
                                                    Diana Baria

                                                    I agree whole heartedly with "flyover" 530687. No one bails us out. Why only the mega corporations? I hope who ever wins the election has a magic wand to help fix the mess our economy is in! Change the bankruptcy laws back the way they were..it worked for quite a long time. Folks need help to get on the right track again. Those who didn't mind the store in these huge corporations should be held accountable. The Feds have to stop rescuing these institutions..maybe they will see that things are run more responsibly if they get a good spanking!

                                                    • 1 vote
                                                    #5.2 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:33 PM EDT
                                                    Chuck1968

                                                    And when they themselves prove that this does not work, then they go to Joe Public for money!

                                                    On top of that they are STILL claiming "free market", hands off government, and profit maximizing works and have now pointed the finger at their victims (the home owners they talked into the "biggest house they could buy, for investment"). It goes way beyond that --they tried to hide their risky investments that they sold to each other by bundling. CAPITALISTS ARE PIGS and the Gordon Geko style of capitalism does NOT work. Greed is NOT good.
                                                    And the republicans responsible for creating this mess are trying to pin it on Clinton and at the same time telling us the economy is strong and the banking industry "financially sound".

                                                    • 2 votes
                                                    #5.3 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:10 PM EDT
                                                    3sheets2thewind

                                                    Americans are just a bunch of whiners!

                                                    "Fundamentals of our economy are strong".

                                                    Everyone loves a good depression that is why they vote for the GOP.

                                                    Never in the history of the GOP have they been good for the economy or for the the working class.

                                                    The GOP talks the talk but they don't walk the walk.

                                                    • 1 vote
                                                    #5.4 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 11:27 PM EDT
                                                    stockcar19

                                                    What about the dems they have a history too. They are really making history with Pelosi, who by the way refused the floor and turned everything off. Don't forget they have a lower rating than the President. I do not agree with everything the President does and do realize that there are things that go from President to President and nothing ever gets done with them. I used to know what items they were but haven't kept up with it this year.
                                                    As far as the feds bailing these people out, well I think I would have just bought the mortgages in trouble and had the Banking committee work out with the people on how to handle it. As far as that part of AIG that is in trouble I would have had them liquidate what they could and then put them on a strict budget until they were out of trouble. I don't think either Obama or McClain is up to taking care of what needs to be done. We haven't had a strong person run for President for one hell of a long time. We have had both good and bad. We need to clean house and maybe even set term limits, that might help to kept the lobbyists off balance some. I also think that when a bill is written it should stand as written and no add ons or add ins, you can not change the bill in away that has nothing to do with the subject of that bill in that way some of these pet projects won't get done, why because they can't stand alone. I am tired so I am going to go, Thanks for listening. As always just my opinion.

                                                      #5.5 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:02 AM EDT
                                                      spreadex

                                                      Oh Please with the Pelosi crap your party is at fault for this and AIG refused to talk to their former CEO who had a plan that did not get the FED involved. He was on Charlie Rose's show last night. He said there never should have been any of this problem unless they took off the risk management controls he left on when he left the company. He said with their assets it would be easy to borrow the money to stay afloat until they could liquidate enough of their assets to keep going. This is bad paper from the mortgage industry that is sinking them. Maybe Lehman bros were democrats and AIG is Republican. We are being hosed by the Bush admin once again.

                                                      • 1 vote
                                                      #5.6 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 4:55 AM EDT
                                                      logdump

                                                      The head of Enrron said it all: "I have never seen a government regulation that I liked"

                                                      We got rid of the monopoly laws! We deregulated without controls! We gave tax breaks to big business! We let big business run free reign. We are paying the price for our stupidity.

                                                        #5.7 - Thu Sep 18, 2008 8:46 AM EDT
                                                        Reply
                                                        Donttrustrepugnicans

                                                        Why would you want an 80% stake in a company that is about to go bankrupt? This is just another method for repugnicans to bailout their wealthy friends. Deregulation has screwed us all.

                                                        • 7 votes
                                                        Reply#6 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:10 PM EDT
                                                        Sheila-522981

                                                        Deregulation has screwed us, but that was Billy Boy Clinton who did that! Get your facts straight.

                                                        • 5 votes
                                                        #6.1 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:50 PM EDT
                                                        dal

                                                        Sheila-522981

                                                        You are wrong. It was lack of forecasting by our current administration. Just like a horse with blinders on Bush has lead us to believe we can all buy a house and all is well since four years ago. I am not saying Bill has no blame but 9/11, Kitrina, wiretapping, Haliburton, prison abuse, waterboarding, Libby, Maria Shivo, and now this all happened under Bush's watch. I call that a great record.

                                                        • 6 votes
                                                        #6.2 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:56 PM EDT
                                                        6LUKE2026

                                                        If the government bails them out, the government should get all assets, not just 80%, and the management should not even get severance pay, let alone the multi-million dollar parachutes they always arange for themselves. The idiots who created the problem should be banned from financial-sector employment for life.

                                                        It may have been Bill who fell for Phil Gramm's deregulation idiocy, but it is George W Bush who neglected this problem for 8 years, until it became a catastrophe. George did so many things to bleed this country dry, one has to start to wonder if it was deliberate. Phil Gramm is now John McCain's economic brain. Heaven help us if McCain gets elected.

                                                        • 8 votes
                                                        #6.3 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:57 PM EDT
                                                        Bunkers Poliltico

                                                        Demugnicans at it again... Say it and it must be true... think it and it must be true... Thank you Sheila for reminding this idiot of the facts. There are many more to be stated - Where are the INVESTIGATIONS? You won't see them because Barack Hussein Obama would be stripped of any chance of winning the election.

                                                        Bunker

                                                          #6.4 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:59 PM EDT
                                                          Bunkers PolilticoExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                          Dal - you are a blaton idiot! You from New Orleans? I bet your momma never touch you accountability - if you had a momma... When President Bush was elected, he was elected President of the United States of America, not God! He wasn't given the power to slam this country with hurricanes or to make them avoid this great nation. Here are some facts for you, do you understand the word facts, probably not but here is education for you....

                                                          On November 12, 1999, President Bill Clinton signed into law the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which repealed the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933. One of the effects of the repeal was to allow commercial and investment banks to consolidate. Some economists have criticized the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act as contributing to the 2007 subprime mortgage financial crisis. Can you say Thank You Mr. Ihavesexissues Clinton!

                                                          • 1 vote
                                                          #6.5 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:27 PM EDT
                                                          MNWriter

                                                          He signed it - who passed it? Did you people forget who was running the Congress in 1999?

                                                          • 2 votes
                                                          #6.6 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:01 PM EDT
                                                          Bunkers Poliltico

                                                          But it was the Clinton administration, obsessed with multiculturalism, that dictated where mortgage lenders could lend, and originally helped create the market for the high-risk subprime loans now infecting like a retrovirus the balance sheets of many of Wall Street's most revered institutions.

                                                          Tough new regulations forced lenders into high-risk areas where they had no choice but to lower lending standards to make the loans that sound business practices had previously guarded against making. It was either that or face stiff government penalties.

                                                          The untold story in this whole national crisis is that President Clinton put on steroids the Community Redevelopment Act, a well-intended Carter-era law designed to encourage minority homeownership. And in so doing, he helped create the market for the risky subprime loans that he and Democrats now decry as not only greedy but "predatory."

                                                          You need more MNWriter?

                                                          • 6 votes
                                                          #6.7 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:14 PM EDT
                                                          lisa lu

                                                          I think people like dal should be grateful that Bush was elected president. Had he not been, who else would they have to blame? Everything will be President Bush's fault forever more. The fact is the problems this country is facing is not simply because of Bush, it is not simply because of the Democrats, and it is not simply because of the Republicans. It is all of them!!! All the politicians...Politicians pass laws and tax the working class to keep themselves in power. All politicians pander to their special interest groups, and their big businesses of choice to keep themselves in office. They all benefit, while the working class suffers.
                                                          But go ahead blame it all on Bush.

                                                            #6.8 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:22 PM EDT
                                                            John McConeExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                            I can say Phil Gramm as in Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.

                                                            I can say James Leach, I can say Thomas Bliley............

                                                            These are the 3 republican mutha&*^%&^s that are responsible for this financial cluster^&*$.

                                                            You wanted to be all big and bad talking about Clinton, Obama, and Dal's momma when it's really about Gramm, McCain, and Bush.

                                                            Take your sorry, lying a$$ back to school you blatant idiot.

                                                            • 2 votes
                                                            #6.9 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:49 PM EDT
                                                            Gary-349080

                                                            Deregulation of the financial industry came with the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999. It was signed into law by Bill Clinton.

                                                            • 2 votes
                                                            #6.10 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:54 PM EDT
                                                            Kc77

                                                            Since you wanted to go here yes the bill was Gramm-Leach.... Now who do you know is named Gramm and is working on the economic plan with John McCain....lol you'd shoot your own foot off despite your face. Why do you think McCain isn't bringing it up who signed the bill, maybe because his economic advisor is the one who wrote it perhaps??

                                                            • 2 votes
                                                            #6.11 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 11:30 PM EDT
                                                            BEV_OKC_CITIZEN

                                                            Thank you Kc for advising Archie Bunker about the facts. Dear God...what some people will do to take away from the obvious republican faux paus.

                                                            Let's hope and pray they don't make it to the polls, if they don't change their ignorant ways!

                                                            • 1 vote
                                                            #6.12 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:06 AM EDT
                                                            Donttrustrepugnicans

                                                            Not all liberals were/are happy with Clinton's centerist policies. Obviously he moved much to far to the right. Clinton also help usher in free trade, what a boon for us all. It does not change that deregulation has put us in this bind.

                                                              #6.13 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 6:59 AM EDT
                                                              Shan-man

                                                              YES, SHeila you ARE VERY WRONG in that statement! It was Bush and McC's votes (Along with other screww-ups) that got that legislation passed!

                                                              This one in Particular!

                                                              "The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act aimed to make the country's financial institutions competitive by removing the Depression-era walls between banking, investment and insurance companies."

                                                              Read it! LEACH is such a great name/word to have built right into it!!!!!!!!!!!! AND we all know how great Gramm is! I've had my scope on him more than once!

                                                                #6.14 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:55 PM EDT
                                                                Reply
                                                                Matt-450714

                                                                Privatise profits and socialise loses. Thats McCain and the Republicans idea of free market. No thanks

                                                                Obama 2008

                                                                  Reply#7 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:10 PM EDT
                                                                  blatnym

                                                                  I bought shares of pets.com. I am expecting a check from the federal government any day now to bail me out. I am too big to fail.

                                                                  • 6 votes
                                                                  Reply#8 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:11 PM EDT
                                                                  BecauseIAm

                                                                  lol No kidding. Who's going to bail out my 401K and financial portfolio now?

                                                                  *pin drop*

                                                                  Hello?

                                                                  • 3 votes
                                                                  #8.1 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:08 PM EDT
                                                                  Marty-530901

                                                                  LOL.

                                                                    #8.2 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:36 PM EDT
                                                                    Roger-356271

                                                                    Bunker,

                                                                    What Gramm is this that promoted this act? He must have been a complete fool. I sure hope he is not still in politics or friends with either of the Candidates that want to fix the Country.

                                                                    • 3 votes
                                                                    #8.3 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:39 PM EDT
                                                                    DTS2707

                                                                    That was fantastic.....

                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                    #8.4 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 11:21 PM EDT
                                                                    Reply
                                                                    Larry Wilson

                                                                    This proves that Bush is WAY more of a Socialist than Obama. Government takeover of private business is the epitome of socialism. Look it up if you don't believe me. This was done by the Bush Admin!!!!

                                                                    OK all you people out there screaming about Obama being a socialist. Go ahead...make my day. Spin your way out of this.

                                                                    • 8 votes
                                                                    Reply#9 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:13 PM EDT
                                                                    Bunkers PolilticoExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

                                                                    Are you freaking kidding me Larry Imaliberal Wilson??? Get out from behind your koolaid glass and research the facts! I believe this all dates back to Glass Steagall, ever heard of it? Bill Ihavesexissues Clinton does and since he did we have these very issues today. Don't look at me I didn't vote for him/her!

                                                                    You Big Smuck!

                                                                    Bunker

                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                    #9.1 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:05 PM EDT
                                                                    lisa lu

                                                                    Just remember...The Democrats control Congress. In fact they have had control of both houses for two years now...Crongress makes most of the rules. Just proves the point about Obama being socialist.

                                                                    • 3 votes
                                                                    #9.2 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:10 PM EDT
                                                                    Bunkers Poliltico

                                                                    Exactly lisa lee and why isn't anyone talking about it in the election? Everyone is to busy pointing their finger to President Bush... I am sick of it, he deserves more respect than he is getting. What is the Congress/Senate approval rating? Presidnet Bush's is better! He is a president not God.

                                                                    Bunker

                                                                    • 3 votes
                                                                    #9.3 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:40 PM EDT
                                                                    Larry Wilson

                                                                    bunkers,

                                                                    It was McCain's financial advisor Phil Grahmm who pushed for repeal of Glass Steagall. I don't know the details of why Clinton signed the bill, but it was, after all a Republican Congress led by speaker Newt Gingrich. EVER HEARD OF THAT?.

                                                                    Besides there are laws on the books that make many of the fraudlent practices of the mortgage brokers that caused this mess illegal. An astute administration could have prevented the current mortgage meltdown merely by enforcing existing laws. Unfortunately the Bush admin was either ignorant or turned a blind eye.

                                                                    and lisa,

                                                                    I've seen this tired attempt to put the blame for the current conditions on the democratic congress. Sorry. The Repubs controlled congress and white house for 6 of the last 8 years. The Democrats have a slim majority, but are hamstrung by Bush's veto power. there is no comparison. The Democrats are not in control. You are completely wrong.

                                                                    • 5 votes
                                                                    #9.4 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:41 PM EDT
                                                                    Skep-Tik

                                                                    The day the President makes law is the day the US ceases to exist. We've been close to that these last 7+ years.

                                                                    The repeal of Glass-Steagall was engineered 3 Republicans, Phil Gramm R-TX, James Leach R-IA and Tom Bliley R-VA.

                                                                    Clinton signed the bill since the Senate passed it 90-9. Why waste a veto?

                                                                    Sorry, Bunker... you're wrong.

                                                                    Oh and that fella Phil Gramm is McCain's economic guru. That's gotta make you feel real good...

                                                                    • 3 votes
                                                                    #9.5 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:44 PM EDT
                                                                    Scar-481986

                                                                    Iisa in the senate you need over 60 votes, the Dems don't have it. Basic civics class. Now if they get that 60 , and don't do anything ... you have a point then. With a real majority, the Dems better show some results. Or I'll join you in voting the bums out:-)

                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                    #9.6 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:47 PM EDT
                                                                    Bunkers Poliltico

                                                                    How many of Barack Hussein Obama's staff/supporters/friends were/are involved in Fan & Fred? The Dem's finger prints are all over this one. You can run and hide behind President Bush's low approval rating, but sooner or later the truth will come out and out it will come, in October... That's why there is no investigation...

                                                                    Bunker

                                                                    • 2 votes
                                                                    #9.7 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:55 PM EDT
                                                                    Larry Wilson

                                                                    bunkers,

                                                                    give it up. your BS has been discredited and you are now grasping at straws with some vague references to Obama's friends.

                                                                    this is Republicans fault and few are dumb enough to think it's not.

                                                                    • 3 votes
                                                                    #9.8 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:20 PM EDT
                                                                    Bunkers Poliltico

                                                                    Yeah, you Liberals don't want to talk about Obama or his friends... don't blame you, they are his demise, as if he needed any help... Prompters at rodeo's... that's intelligent! I'll give it up -- on Nov. 4th when John & Sarah kick Sen. Hussein's a--... Oh yeah... Lipstick anyone???

                                                                    • 2 votes
                                                                    #9.9 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:37 PM EDT
                                                                    Bob, Lincoln County, NC

                                                                    bunkers is a paid republican troll .. don;t you know that ??? they go on these boards - spout nonsense and hope to get people to forget the real issues.... just to get down an dirty debunking their hatred .. much like the Palin/McSame campaign is doing ... well guess what - spout away - you can't change the facts ... blame Clinton??? Come on - repukes had the house/senate and whitehouse for at least 6 of the last 8 years - they couldn't fix anything but a few elections ... and fix those they did!

                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                    #9.10 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:44 PM EDT
                                                                    NatefromWAstate

                                                                    Bush deserves no respect. Two recessions under his watch, the forced war, incredible dishonesty, corruption throughout the entire captial, neocon agenda, the list goes on forever. Bush is horrible and he deserves credit for nothing. He had Osama cornered and ordered the troops back, he has never answered for that, and I'm sure he'll hire people to get you to forget about it.

                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                    #9.11 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 11:30 PM EDT
                                                                    Bored with dribble

                                                                    Bankrupt America! vote 4 more years of retardicans! vote Cougar and Mclame..

                                                                      #9.12 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:53 AM EDT
                                                                      Reply
                                                                      trizzybob

                                                                      so ... because it is a loan and not a takeover, the taxpayer is going to make a profit??????????...right?

                                                                      • 6 votes
                                                                      Reply#10 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:14 PM EDT
                                                                      BankruptUSA

                                                                      I'll be waiting with baited breath for my dividend check to arrive. Won't you?

                                                                        #10.1 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:05 PM EDT
                                                                        trizzybob

                                                                        if Bin Laden's goal was to bankrupt the US then..........?

                                                                          #10.2 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 6:21 AM EDT
                                                                          Reply
                                                                          JAGER

                                                                          BushBiz at its finest. Yesterday NO MORE BAILOUTS Today...overnight we got calls from the Friends O' Bush that would lose and today BAILOUT COMING on the back of the taxpayer again. Doesnt matter that the same money could stall the foreclosures on nearly every home loan failing today....just save the fat cats on the backs of the little people again. And my friends wonder why I wont vote McCain.....

                                                                          • 7 votes
                                                                          Reply#11 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:14 PM EDT
                                                                          dal

                                                                          We call this "small government" buyout. Yep government should be small until we want them to buy our failing business. I wonder how many CEO's of those businesses are laughing that we bought the trickle down nonsense. Guess what trickled down?

                                                                          • 3 votes
                                                                          #11.1 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:00 PM EDT
                                                                          Bunkers Poliltico

                                                                          The truth and nothing but the truth... On November 12, 1999, President Bill Clinton signed into law the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which repealed the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933. One of the effects of the repeal was to allow commercial and investment banks to consolidate. Some economists have criticized the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act as contributing to the 2007 subprime mortgage financial crisis. Can you say, "Thank you Mr. Ihavesexissues Clinton!"

                                                                          YOU BIG SMUCK!

                                                                          Bunker

                                                                          • 2 votes
                                                                          #11.2 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:12 PM EDT
                                                                          Skep-Tik

                                                                          The day the President makes law is the day the US ceases to exist. We've been close to that these last 7+ years.

                                                                          The repeal of Glass-Steagall was engineered 3 Republicans, Phil Gramm R-TX, James Leach R-IA and Tom Bliley R-VA.

                                                                          Clinton signed the bill since the Senate passed it 90-9. Why waste a veto?

                                                                          Sorry, Bunker... you're wrong.

                                                                          Oh and that fella Phil Gramm is McCain's economic guru. That's gotta make you feel real good...

                                                                          • 2 votes
                                                                          #11.3 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:46 PM EDT
                                                                          Larry Wilson

                                                                          bunkers,

                                                                          read skep-tik's reply. says it all.....and SMUCK yourself

                                                                          • 1 vote
                                                                          #11.4 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:57 PM EDT
                                                                          Bunkers Poliltico

                                                                          But it was the Clinton administration, obsessed with multiculturalism, that dictated where mortgage lenders could lend, and originally helped create the market for the high-risk subprime loans now infecting like a retrovirus the balance sheets of many of Wall Street's most revered institutions.

                                                                          Tough new regulations forced lenders into high-risk areas where they had no choice but to lower lending standards to make the loans that sound business practices had previously guarded against making. It was either that or face stiff government penalties.

                                                                          The untold story in this whole national crisis is that President Clinton put on steroids the Community Redevelopment Act, a well-intended Carter-era law designed to encourage minority homeownership. And in so doing, he helped create the market for the risky subprime loans that he and Democrats now decry as not only greedy but "predatory."

                                                                          Get out from behind your kool aid glass... your glass is empty....

                                                                          • 2 votes
                                                                          #11.5 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:19 PM EDT
                                                                          Chuck1968

                                                                          On November 12, 1999, President Bill Clinton signed into law the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act,

                                                                          Yes republicans are really that stupid. Thanks for proving it again Bonkers Politico. What the heck is a smuck?

                                                                          • 2 votes
                                                                          #11.6 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:19 PM EDT
                                                                          Larry Wilson

                                                                          bunkers get over it,

                                                                          there has been 8 years for Bush and 6 for the Republican congress to fix things and they didn't do it. Your blaming Clinton for the current state affairs just won't stick. And Carter was 30 years ago....blaming Carter for this is just plain pathetic. Republicans made this bed, now they have to sleep in it.

                                                                            #11.7 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 11:17 PM EDT
                                                                            stockcar19

                                                                            This is true it was the Clinton watch. Go back in history and read you will see. What about the buy out Bank of America is trying to do. They already do loans, mortgages and other banking services to people who do not have SS cards, drivers licenses and etc. Than they sold these loans, I could not find the article that stated this so believe it or not. Now just who do you think took advantage of these services. As always just my opinion.

                                                                              #11.8 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:20 AM EDT
                                                                              Idontknowjack

                                                                              PLEASE do not use O' in conjunction with Bush. It's a disgrace to the IRISH

                                                                                #11.9 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:32 AM EDT
                                                                                MRZK.COM

                                                                                Yes, the Republicans JUST got into Office...I have it - it is George Washington's fault. Talk about ducking accountability, I'd say subpeona them, but the Republicans never show up. Anyone for some Citizens Arrests?

                                                                                  #11.10 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:09 PM EDT
                                                                                  Reply
                                                                                  FedUp-349435

                                                                                  "Fed nears a deal to take over ailing AIG Extraordinary move would give central bank 80% stake in insurance giant"

                                                                                  85 BILLION dollars of tax payer money just went down the drain. Plus how the hell is it legal for the Central Bank to become 80 percent owners in a PRIVATLY Traded Company.

                                                                                  Those mofo's just took our money without due cause.

                                                                                  Paulson you are a F R A U D and let me say that again Paulson you are a FRAUD

                                                                                  The out right thieft of tax payer money to line the pockets of the rich on wall street is criminal and Paulson should get his ass arrested and then sent to jail waiting for trail.

                                                                                  PAULSON YOU ARE A @!$%#ING FRUAD

                                                                                  And folks check this out:

                                                                                  From left, acting Chairman and Commissioner of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission Walter Lukken, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission Christopher Cox and Federal Reserve Governor Kevin Warsh speak outside the West Wing of the White House after a meeting with President Bush

                                                                                  Those are the people who did this. Meeting at the white house, yup that says it all on why the fed bailout of AIG. All of those people needs to goto jail and be hammered into the ground.

                                                                                  I see pitch forks and torches soon, soon this country will have to pay for what it is doing. The day of reconning is coming real fast now.

                                                                                  I also want to know WHO did we have to borrow that 85 BILLION from to bailout AIG. Damn out national debt just grew big time this week. So far the fed's has poured about 600 BILLION dollars into the markets. Well the fed's plus other forgein goverments have. 600 BILLION just this week, that alone says that the USA in in some deep trouble. As I said the time is coming real fast and what this country is doing will need to be repaid.

                                                                                  • 9 votes
                                                                                  Reply#12 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:15 PM EDT
                                                                                  banshee8989

                                                                                  "Those mofo's just took our money without due cause. "

                                                                                  Yeap... that pretty much sums it up. Forget all the facts about why they did it or if it will help...... the biggest problem is IT WAS NOT THERE MONEY TO GIVE and we are so in debt already..... where did this money come from anyway?

                                                                                  Good thing for them most people dont understand or dont care about anything but what happens in there own little world.

                                                                                  • 4 votes
                                                                                  #12.1 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:01 PM EDT
                                                                                  MRZK.COM

                                                                                  Well, to start with, if you are nearing retirement, kiss your Social Security goodbye.
                                                                                  If not, just kiss the value of a dollar goodbye.

                                                                                  Was this the goal of deregulation and globalization? - To lower our standard of living to that of a third world country???

                                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                                  #12.2 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:39 PM EDT
                                                                                  Tad-401841

                                                                                  We can expect more changes in SS retirement rules. The eligible amounts are slowly being reduced with the qualification age slowly being increased. Also the criteria for eligibility in terms of those already receiving a government, state or city pension has changed. You will receive much less if your pension wasn't contributing to SS (FICA Tax) during your employment.

                                                                                  Also inflation has and still is eating way at the dollar and devaluing our SS benefits steadily.

                                                                                    #12.3 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:44 PM EDT
                                                                                    Reply
                                                                                    farkedintheusa

                                                                                    This just goes to show that our Country is doomed.

                                                                                    The fat cats who run the company into the ground...still get their fat check (22,000,000.00 for the AIG is the last one I read).

                                                                                    The crooks that borrowed more than they could afford, while their fraud was perpetuated by the appraisers, real estate brokers and loan brokers will keep their houses or walk away from them as we pay to "bail" them out.

                                                                                    That douchebag Obama and his dolt of an opponant Mcdumb-dumb debate about who sucks more.

                                                                                    All the while, criminals come to this country and become "productive members of society" while filing for SSD claims take over everything.

                                                                                    Time to move!

                                                                                    • 3 votes
                                                                                    Reply#13 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:19 PM EDT
                                                                                    dal

                                                                                    Or vote

                                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                                    #13.1 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:01 PM EDT
                                                                                    MRZK.COM

                                                                                    Flip this [White] House!

                                                                                      #13.2 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:40 PM EDT
                                                                                      Reply
                                                                                      jeg-530712

                                                                                      unbelieveable! people need to be outraged by this!!!! the titanic is sinking and our government is helping the financial elite secure the best lifeboats!

                                                                                      • 10 votes
                                                                                      Reply#14 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:19 PM EDT
                                                                                      dal

                                                                                      Yeah we love those CEO'S that are working at a failed business as they sit in their mansions. Thanks!

                                                                                      • 3 votes
                                                                                      #14.1 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:02 PM EDT
                                                                                      Marty-530901

                                                                                      THANK YOU dal!

                                                                                        #14.2 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:44 PM EDT
                                                                                        Reply
                                                                                        George Hartwell

                                                                                        Help! I can't pay my bills, drive my car, afford medical insurance, buy groceries, etc. I need $85 billion! (P.S. I'm the CEO of my organization. My contract requires that I receive $300 million in severance pay!)

                                                                                        • 6 votes
                                                                                        Reply#15 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:21 PM EDT
                                                                                        MRZK.COM

                                                                                        Step right up, Mr. Former Contributor.

                                                                                          #15.1 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:41 PM EDT
                                                                                          Reply
                                                                                          Barry DeCarli

                                                                                          I'm not an economist, but I think that with or without the Fed's intervention here the taxpayer will pay. If I personally went bankrupt the ramifications would be miniscule - no ripple effect, but if AIG does, what will happen? What we will need are some powerful regulations (and enforcement) to prevent situations like this from happening. The actions of the CEOs of these huge companies should be criminal. At the very least, loans should be given only to folks who could afford to pay them back. Something needs to be done to restore faith in our financial institutions. Is this the right thing to do? I don't know, but do we really want all of these huge businesses to fail? How can that be good?

                                                                                          • 5 votes
                                                                                          Reply#16 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:23 PM EDT
                                                                                          truth and justice

                                                                                          remember Enron, World Com , Tyco, California energy crisis and nothing happened and Kenneth Lay slips into his private jet and is living large in some central american mansion , ready to move on washington I know I am!!!!!!!!!

                                                                                          • 2 votes
                                                                                          #16.1 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:49 PM EDT
                                                                                          kl0510

                                                                                          Should not the person who borrowed more than they could afford not be held accountable as well? I think I have enough sense to know whether or not I can afford to pay back what I borrow, but yes, we have made credit available to anyone who has an address. Just google The Great Depression, read about the chain of events that lead up to it. Sound familiar? You can blame big business, Bush, Clinton, the Democratic or Republican congress. This definitely wasn't brought on by just one person or one political party. Everybody had a hand in it. Citizens have to take some responsibility for their actions as well.

                                                                                          • 1 vote
                                                                                          #16.2 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:23 PM EDT
                                                                                          E000

                                                                                          Ken Lay is dead. He died in Colorado and never fled the country.

                                                                                          • 1 vote
                                                                                          #16.3 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:24 PM EDT
                                                                                          Mark-531074

                                                                                          Ummm, that Kenneth Lay dude is dead.

                                                                                            #16.4 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:42 PM EDT
                                                                                            Tad-401841

                                                                                            We're paying more for all the bailouts with tax money than we would if these institutions were left in the sun for the buzzards.

                                                                                            "Faith" in our financial institutions is at its lowest right now and getting lower with each failure.

                                                                                            Big business and greed is the primary cause of this economic downturn (crash) with help of government of course (intentionally or not.)

                                                                                              #16.5 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 6:30 AM EDT
                                                                                              MRZK.COM

                                                                                              Ken Lay - In Witness Protection Program lest he turn and say what he really knows!!!

                                                                                              C'mon, that "death" was too much of a coincidence to be plausible.

                                                                                              Habeas Corpus!

                                                                                                #16.6 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:43 PM EDT
                                                                                                Reply
                                                                                                Guspachio

                                                                                                Does anybody know if this will help or negatively affect mortgage interest rates?

                                                                                                  Reply#17 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:23 PM EDT
                                                                                                  Donttrustrepugnicans

                                                                                                  Rates will most likely go up as there is less money to lend and lenders are less trusting with the little money they have.

                                                                                                  • 2 votes
                                                                                                  #17.1 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:42 PM EDT
                                                                                                  Sheila-522981

                                                                                                  Well with the AIG news today, the mortgage market was off more than 1 point. So no it's not good. Less lenders, less money, lending standards are getting tighter by the day, this has been going on now since last August. I know as a I work for a mortgage co.

                                                                                                  • 3 votes
                                                                                                  #17.2 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:53 PM EDT
                                                                                                  Arkansas mom

                                                                                                  Since you work for a mortgage co., do you think that it would necessarily be a bad thing (in the long term) for lending standards to get tighter? Thanks.

                                                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                                                  #17.3 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:18 PM EDT
                                                                                                  Chris-531243

                                                                                                  I have a suggestion for US home mortgage rates.

                                                                                                  You are paying too much interest. The Fed rate is 2% and your mortgage rates are 6%. That is too much spread. I propose that the reason for the spread is that the banks are covering themselves in case inflation comes back over the next 25 years.

                                                                                                  What we do in Canada is take 5 year mortgages (with a 25 year amortization rate) thereby transferring the inflation risk (ie. interest rates) to the homeowner. The US practice of 25 and 30 year mortgages traps the borrower into high rates in times like this.

                                                                                                  I, as a homeowner, would rather take the inflatrion risk and pay 4%. That can be the difference between staying in my house or being on the street. If 4% mortgages were available in the US the housing market would get a shot in the arm and people would not have to walk away from their houses.

                                                                                                  Chris

                                                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                                                  #17.4 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 11:58 PM EDT
                                                                                                  GK Thetruth

                                                                                                  Chris,

                                                                                                  You are an ignorant Canadian. That is part of the problem that has created this mess. Americans using Arms (adjustable rate mortgages) and then not being able to pay the higher mortgage when it adjusts.

                                                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                                                  #17.5 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:06 AM EDT
                                                                                                  Chris-531243

                                                                                                  GK.

                                                                                                  Actually we can lock in for 5 years if we want. Also the rates are not teaser rates used to convince people to buy over their heads. They are realistic rates with much less spread and the spread will remain small in 5 years when I renew.

                                                                                                  Re-read my posting and think about it. It works. We have a very stable situation here with virtually no housing crisis.

                                                                                                  Chris

                                                                                                    #17.6 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:19 AM EDT
                                                                                                    Tad-401841

                                                                                                    Stricter qualification standards and higher interest rates by lenders even though the Fed rate is much lower equals less risk and more profit for the lender. They're playing it safer this time having gotten burned previously.

                                                                                                      #17.7 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 6:37 AM EDT
                                                                                                      MRZK.COM

                                                                                                      GK [can't handle "the truth"]

                                                                                                      What caused this was:

                                                                                                      1 - GREED
                                                                                                      2 - Deregulation

                                                                                                      The homeowner did not come up with this "creative financing", the mortgage companies did. Their mantra was "close, close, close...collect the fees and screw the world".

                                                                                                      They used the most devious bait and switch schemes possible.

                                                                                                      Example: "Guarantee" refinancing, get the homeowner lined up - and then suddenly after weeks of work, on the day of the loan signing, there is a surprise - "I'm sorry the rate has gone up, but we do have you qualified for this ARM - you can always refinance again in 2 years [wink!]" Most people bit (or were boxed in and had no choice).

                                                                                                      If you doubt this, check with some former mortgage company workers. Why else would mortgage lenders be going to "sales meetings" and training in sales techniques? They sold mortgages like used cars to people that falsely trusted them (while they laughed at the suckers like ENRON helpin' out granma).

                                                                                                        #17.8 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:53 PM EDT
                                                                                                        Reply
                                                                                                        DaJeepster

                                                                                                        The Fed kept interest rate the same because of inflation risk, and then adds 85 billion to the national debt?

                                                                                                        I will never understand this logic.

                                                                                                        The whole mess was created with sub prime mortgages. Why is the government so resistant to giving mortgages at the same discount offered to big banks? If mortgages were around 4% and the Fed is loaning at 2% there should be a profit in there somewhere.

                                                                                                        The Fed is putting a shiny new roof on a building with a crumbling foundation.

                                                                                                        • 2 votes
                                                                                                        Reply#18 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:24 PM EDT
                                                                                                        Educated Veteran

                                                                                                        You're right. You will likely never understand. Think of it like this...If you put that shiny new roof on a building with a foundation issue, it gives you the chance to fix the issue. If you don't, the building falls and can only be srapped to start over, not repaired. The sub-prime market triggered the AIG issue, but it is only part of the problem. I'm sorry that I don't have a simple analogy for derivatives, but they are one of the major underlying causes of our current little economic issue.

                                                                                                          #18.1 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:49 AM EDT
                                                                                                          Reply
                                                                                                          Merrill-387190

                                                                                                          Actually, what it gives the government is an 85% stake in the exposure of AIG. I doubt it gives the government (that's us taxpayers) a stake in anything of value. But, I agree with JAGER, Bush's buddies cried help and suddenly whatever was said yesterday is forgotten. The problem is that this isn't to bail out Wall Street. This is to bail out the companies who purchased insurance from AIG against non-payment of debts by their customers. If AIG were to fail, these companies would have to eat their bad judgment of extending credit to high risk customers. That would be too bad, but at least the pain would be distributed across many many companies and investors. However, I agree with FedUP, PAULSON IS A FRAUD!

                                                                                                          I think it's about time for a tax payer revolt! Why should those, who are careful to avoid foolish risks be required to pay for the poor judgment of those idiots?

                                                                                                          • 4 votes
                                                                                                          Reply#19 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:24 PM EDT
                                                                                                          Reply
                                                                                                          Merrill-387190

                                                                                                          Actually, none of this would even be possible, if Congress hadn't just passed a new law allowing it.

                                                                                                          • 2 votes
                                                                                                          Reply#20 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:26 PM EDT
                                                                                                          6LUKE2026

                                                                                                          Blackmail is so easy in an election year.

                                                                                                          • 1 vote
                                                                                                          #20.1 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:08 PM EDT
                                                                                                          Roger-356271

                                                                                                          Merrill,

                                                                                                          Im think the President had to sign it didn't he? I still want to know who this silly Gramm person is that brought about this mess.

                                                                                                          • 1 vote
                                                                                                          #20.2 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:49 PM EDT
                                                                                                          Skep-Tik

                                                                                                          Actually the bailout wasn't an idea of Congress or the Executive. The other members of the G8 called Paulsen and explained to him in no uncertain terms that, whether by private funds or public funds, AIG was not going to fail. If Paulsen allowed it to fail, they would not show at the T Bill auctions. Large numbers of companies on the G7's stock markets bought into the AIG safe investment/easy money schemes. I hear 40% of the companies on the French stock market have AIG paper.

                                                                                                            #20.3 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:00 PM EDT
                                                                                                            GK Thetruth

                                                                                                            Where did you get all that info Skep?

                                                                                                              #20.4 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:02 AM EDT
                                                                                                              Educated Veteran

                                                                                                              It wasn't just the French. The Fed would have paid this money out in other ways regardless. An AIG failure would have caused unbelievable economic damage in the US and globally.

                                                                                                                #20.5 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:42 AM EDT
                                                                                                                Skep-Tik

                                                                                                                GK, It was a backpage article buried in the WSJ. I'm digging for it today. Also check out Financial Times. They are pretty good at putting this together too.

                                                                                                                  #20.6 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:27 AM EDT
                                                                                                                  Reply
                                                                                                                  ira m trager

                                                                                                                  it looks like christmas in september for our major financial institutions who were fiscally irresponsible. uncle sam is handing out billions like we hand out Halloween candy. no one cuts us a break if we screw up our finances. so now we the American people own these institutions without the benefits of ownership. our government needs to earn some dividends on those billions for us.

                                                                                                                  • 3 votes
                                                                                                                  Reply#21 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:27 PM EDT
                                                                                                                  dal

                                                                                                                  Help Uncle Sam my house needs a buyout. What no deal? I guess you can just buy out those businesses then.

                                                                                                                  • 3 votes
                                                                                                                  #21.1 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:04 PM EDT
                                                                                                                  6LUKE2026

                                                                                                                  If they gave the struggling homeowners a deal like this, there wouldn't be many loan defaults to worry about.

                                                                                                                  • 6 votes
                                                                                                                  #21.2 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:10 PM EDT
                                                                                                                  Educated Veteran

                                                                                                                  If you look objectively at most loan defaults, the defaulter is the primary person to blame. They did something that caused it most of the time. While there are those exceptions that we all feel sorry for, the vast majority brought this on themselves. There will be as many people get rich off of this issue as there are loosers. There are those who are positioned to take advantage of the situation (the vultures) and those who put themselves into a bad place financially that get swollowed up (the meat).

                                                                                                                  • 1 vote
                                                                                                                  #21.3 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:55 AM EDT
                                                                                                                  pjwrites

                                                                                                                  Educated Veteran, you need an education - get your facts straight - these people brought it on themselves like the freakin' Jews brought the Holocaust on themselves. It's simply NOT TRUE.

                                                                                                                    #21.4 - Thu Sep 18, 2008 1:05 PM EDT
                                                                                                                    Voter-in-LA

                                                                                                                    6LUKE2026, how you figure? AIG has over a trillion in assets so 87 billion in exchange for the control it is getting is nothing close to what a homeowner with the inability to read his mortgage documents could offer. If the average defaulting homeowner had any kind of equity and ability to meet their obligations, they could get themselves out of the hole too.

                                                                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                                                                    #21.5 - Thu Sep 18, 2008 1:15 PM EDT
                                                                                                                    pjwrites

                                                                                                                    Voter-in-LA,

                                                                                                                    Ahem. You DO understand that our government is selling us out here, right?

                                                                                                                    You do understand that THE FED is an individually owned and operated BUSINESS and not a government entity, right?

                                                                                                                    You do understand that the 80+ BILLION DOLLARS that you and I are providing THE FED not only gives them 80 billion of our money but also gives THEM the BENEFIT of that TRILLION dollars in assets, right?

                                                                                                                    You do understand the when our government agreed to allow oil drilling, that INDIVIDUAL BUSINESSES will drill our national resources right out of the ground from under us and then SELL IT BACK TO US FOR A PROFIT, right?

                                                                                                                    You do understand that the average citizen, whether they are meeting their mortgage obligations or not, had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ECONOMIC SITUATION WE ARE IN TODAY, right? The average citizen holds no responsibility for fiscal policy, that rests with our President and Congress. The average citizen has no control over business regulation (for example, credit card graft), the government does.

                                                                                                                    This blind acceptance of what the media, big business and our government tells us is what has gotten us here today, my friend.

                                                                                                                    The media laughs and says, well folks, we've been riding high for too long and now we'll have to pay the price! But what this really means is that the bankers, big business and government - all the top 1% of our nation's wealthiest - have STOLEN our HARD-EARNED money, and all of our ASSETS, and now want to tell us that it's OUR FAULT. They distract us from the REAL issues because they know we will beat each other to death playing the blame game - while they get off scott free!

                                                                                                                    And won't this give those surviving bankers an awesome opportunity to continue to manipulate the market - they can cannibalize the competition, foreclose on existing loans, own those homes for the price they're worth today, and then turn around and sell them when the market recovers (when they make it recover) for a nifty little profit. Won't this give the government the excuse they need to raise taxes - even though it wasn't us who spent, spent, spent our nation into debt - BUT THEM and their policies and budgets!

                                                                                                                    We're idiots being taken advantage of by smug, unscrupulous, hypocrits who tell us we should abstain from sex while they're raping us.

                                                                                                                    Impeach every one of them NOW. They are thieves and liars every one.

                                                                                                                      #21.6 - Thu Sep 18, 2008 3:39 PM EDT
                                                                                                                      Voter-in-LA

                                                                                                                      If they're drilling oil under you and you're not seeing a penny then you bought the wrong property or the seller bamboozled you. Personally I get my mineral rights royalties.

                                                                                                                      But in essence you seem to be missing my point as to my response: AIG does at least have some assets that are being used as security for the 87billion. Whether those are real or fictional assets remains to be seen. The post I was replying to simply was looking for a similar bailout for the average homeowner. Precisely what can the average homeowner offer as collateral for such a bailout? They have no equity (if they did they could borrow), they have no other assets, they've abused credit, the list goes on.

                                                                                                                      I am not necessarily agreeing that this bailout is good or even desirable, I am simply stating that comparing a bailout for AIG with a bailout for homeowners are two separate and distinct issues.

                                                                                                                      • 1 vote
                                                                                                                      #21.7 - Thu Sep 18, 2008 5:51 PM EDT
                                                                                                                      pjwrites

                                                                                                                      I guess what all my huffin' and puffin' was about was this: that 87 billion dollar loan essentially came, in part, from those homeowners who have "no equity" or "collateral", via taxes.

                                                                                                                      The Fed got a loan from taxpayers (some of which are those homeowners - or ex-homeowners, I should say) in order to buy AIG's assets. Am I right or am I wrong? Please let me know if I have this wrong.

                                                                                                                      So, it's okay for us taxpayers to give the Fed 87 billion in order to buy a business with assets that they will then profit from, but it's not okay for us to give a floundering citizen a loan in order to continue to pay for a home that will (if the market works the way it's supposed to) increase in value and be an asset as well? This is what I don't get. Is my reasoning off here somewhere?

                                                                                                                      Re: mineral rights - since the drilling will begin off Florida's coast, for one, who will get mineral rights? Is it owned by the people, is it owned by the State of Florida, is it owned by the country, or will it be owned by the oil companies who will have the good fortune to make billions of dollars in profit from it?

                                                                                                                      I'm not a socialist, but something is seriously wrong when a country is going down the tubes financially, is deeply in debt to other countries, and yet we sell off the potential profits from our natural resources to individually owned corporations. It just doesn't seem like good business.

                                                                                                                        #21.8 - Fri Sep 19, 2008 9:03 AM EDT
                                                                                                                        Voter-in-LA

                                                                                                                        I can't say I disagree with the inequity here. However, I do think what some are losing focus of is the extent to which AIG's demise could/would affect savings plans potentially driving individuals even deeper into debt than they already are.

                                                                                                                        As for bailouts being given to homeowners, would you not define the constant interest rate reductions as considerations given? I'd agree they didn't help most, but by the same token I am not sure what else could have been done. The proposed tax credit that was being discussed would be to my mind equally inequitable as those who are still paying their mortgage in a timely fashion would not receive any kind of like consideration.

                                                                                                                        Overall though I do agree with your sentiment. This bailout is not the best use of our 87 billion. I'd personally would have preferred to see the government assist several other industries first (e.g. automobile springs to mind off the top of my head). Had this kind of investment and support been made into several industries a year or so ago we might not have found ourselves in this situation.

                                                                                                                        Re mineral rights: Florida has for years received the credit from offshore drilling even while they had no rigs. Compare that to LA which only recently started receiving its fair share for the 3500+ rigs we have here. But what would the alternative be as opposed to selling leases? Something like Mexico with PeMex? (Not necessarily a bad thing).

                                                                                                                        Thank you though for keeping this civil, something that too often doesn't happen here.

                                                                                                                        • 1 vote
                                                                                                                        #21.9 - Fri Sep 19, 2008 10:10 AM EDT
                                                                                                                        pjwrites

                                                                                                                        Civility is a two-way street, Voter, so thank you, as well.

                                                                                                                        would you not define the constant interest rate reductions as considerations given?

                                                                                                                        Yes, I would, but to my knowledge (as you mentioned), not many of those reductions have actually benefited homeowners. Mortgage rates and interest rates remain high, as do my property taxes, despite the lower value of my home. So, in my mind, once again, the bankers are benefiting from the reduced interest rates, not the homeowners.

                                                                                                                        As far as rewarding those who didn't handle their finances well, at the expense of those who did, it seems to me we're doing the same thing for businesses.

                                                                                                                        As capitalists, our society has this deep-rooted idea that business must be given these concessions in order to stay afloat - despite the misdeeds (and we're talking fraud, not just over-extending oneself) of CEO's, management, investors, etc. - but those same concessions are not available to ordinary citizens. It's the same choice in war, I suppose: which life holds value - the life of one, or the many? I suppose we should hand out awards to those who lost their homes and say, thank you for letting us give this money to business instead of you, because this way, we can save many wealthy people, instead of just a few poor people. (Okay, that wasn't fair, but you know what I mean.)

                                                                                                                        re: mineral rights
                                                                                                                        If I am to remain an honest person, then I have to admit that I had to look up PeMex to determine what you were talking about. That plan makes me uncomfortable, too, because, so far, our government hasn't shown me they can run a comb through their hair, let alone run a profitable business entity. These are the same people who couldn't seem to manage trillion dollar budgets, without going into debt.

                                                                                                                        As you can see, I certainly don't have many answers, but it seems I have more questions every day.

                                                                                                                          #21.10 - Fri Sep 19, 2008 1:53 PM EDT
                                                                                                                          Voter-in-LA

                                                                                                                          Have to admit I'd completely overlooked the "unfair to other businesses" aspect.

                                                                                                                          I guess the fairest thing to have done with the 87 billion if the desired outcome was to protect the end-users (insureds) would have been to let AIG go under and use the funds to pay out claims to those who would have been affected or to subsidize other insurance companies to take parts of the portfolio over.

                                                                                                                          You are correct that the only ones really seeing the benefit with the lowered rates are the banks. Those who were lucky enough to have fixed rates aren't going to refinance. Those who had fancy ARM's are most likely unable to these days.

                                                                                                                          Like you said, there is no obvious solution (to me anyways).

                                                                                                                          Re: mineral rights - you are correct I too would be uncomfortable with our government who can't even manage our SSN funds being put in charge of mineral assets, however, the sad thing is that in other areas the nationalization of that industry worked and did so for decades (e.g. Norway - Statoil, Pemex as cited above, several Venezuelan operations, etc.).

                                                                                                                            #21.11 - Fri Sep 19, 2008 2:14 PM EDT
                                                                                                                            pjwrites

                                                                                                                            Oh, don't even get me started on social security! lol.

                                                                                                                            You said: (and why won't my quote link work?): "I guess the fairest thing to have done with the 87 billion if the desired outcome was to protect the end-users (insureds) would have been to let AIG go under and use the funds to pay out claims to those who would have been affected or to subsidize other insurance companies to take parts of the portfolio over."

                                                                                                                            Bingo! An excellent, common sense, even Socratean (is there such a word?) solution to the problem. Ever think of running for public office?

                                                                                                                            Have a great weekend, VIA, enjoyed our discussion and hope to meet you for another debate soon.

                                                                                                                              #21.12 - Fri Sep 19, 2008 3:07 PM EDT
                                                                                                                              Reply
                                                                                                                              tim-530732

                                                                                                                              I am appalled at the bailout when I see AIG has bought every plush box seat in every stadium and maxs out their expense accounts for entertaining their high risk clients

                                                                                                                              • 6 votes
                                                                                                                              Reply#22 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:27 PM EDT
                                                                                                                              germanmiman

                                                                                                                              What a crime! Both Paulson and Bernake should be fired. Both are Republicans but the Democrats support these loans. The US taxpayers will pay big time for the loans to the FMs and AIG. First of all the US government is broke so the Treasury will just print dollars for the Fed. This will devalue all of our money.

                                                                                                                              In addition the collateral for the $85 billion will be insufficient to support the loan and I will guarantee that the US taxpayer will pay for the losses.

                                                                                                                              Of course Bush does not understand anything since he is retarded. All voters should kick out their elected officials if they support this loan.
                                                                                                                              Of course those crooks will just say it was an administrative decision by Bernake and Paulson and plead ignorance.
                                                                                                                              Of course in general the US taxpayers are partisan for either the Dems or the Repubs for some silly reason such as religion, birth control, how the candidate's wife dresses, etc.,etc.

                                                                                                                              I can remember Ron Paul saying in the primary debates that the US can not afford the wars and other federal spending and that the US is financially broke. McCain , Guianni, Huckaberry, Thompson, (I did I leave anybody out?) just stood there like dummies or party hacks. Not one of the other Republicans had a fraction of the economic knowledge of Paul yet what do we get for candidates, economic dimwits.

                                                                                                                              • 2 votes
                                                                                                                              Reply#23 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:27 PM EDT
                                                                                                                              AB-420303

                                                                                                                              Germanmiman, you left out Mitt Romney!

                                                                                                                                #23.1 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:58 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                Reply
                                                                                                                                FedUp-349435

                                                                                                                                Maybe I should write my congressmen and say

                                                                                                                                Hey broski, since you are busy bailing out wall street can you throw some bones my way. I am having a hard time making ends meet.

                                                                                                                                What a @!$%#ing joke, AIG should have been left to die and fail. It was ran into the ground by a greedy mother @!$%#er of a CEO. Sorry for my bad words coming forth but damn this pisses me off.

                                                                                                                                I see hard times and I do mean hard times ahead. The USA will crash and now its a sealed fate that can not be stopped. Its only a matter of time because when the tax hikes start flowing left and right the people will not stand for it knowing full damn well that wall street got their ass's bailed out at every damn turn.

                                                                                                                                • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                Reply#24 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:28 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                BEV_OKC_CITIZEN

                                                                                                                                DON'T U WONDER IF ANYONE FROM THESE FIRMS OR IF ANY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS ARE READING THESE COMMENTS???

                                                                                                                                I'm only commenting to all these posts so to not have a complete meltdown; god forbid i cannot afford to have one.

                                                                                                                                I'm already in debt thanks to the health industry and insurance companies after having spinal surgery. Oh...that will be the next big bang this country will feel.

                                                                                                                                This entire country is so screwed up I don't ever see us crawling out from all this debris! Australia's summer is coming up and it's looking pretty good these days. i may deflect to a country that cares for its habitants!

                                                                                                                                  #24.1 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:14 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                  MRZK.COM

                                                                                                                                  Sure they are!

                                                                                                                                  http://www.indyweek.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A19587

                                                                                                                                  As for the poster with spinal surgery...sorry, buddy, we can BAIL OUT Insurance companies, but we have no money for health CARE.

                                                                                                                                  Elect McCain and get ready for the Hoover towns.

                                                                                                                                    #24.2 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:28 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                    MRZK.COM

                                                                                                                                    To the emailers...yes...that WAS several years ago. Imagine how far they've gone since then. That was part of the point.

                                                                                                                                      #24.3 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:36 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                      Reply
                                                                                                                                      dhalgren74

                                                                                                                                      No, no, no, no! This is NOT a good idea. What is going on with our government? Continued bailouts of this nature not only support the decidedly poor judgment of these companies, but hurt the tax payer and reward the very people that are responsible for the screw-ups in the first place. It's like executing the witnesses and giving the defendant a cash settlement for his trouble. I simply cannot abide this type of behavior. Paulson should be publicly executed for crimes against the state if this is allowed to happen. Honestly, how can anyone expect the public to keep taking this kind of irresponsible activity on the part of the government. Let the failed businesses FAIL. That's what a free market IS. This proposal is socialism, nothing more. We can't afford gas these days, and the government wants us to pay for some billionaire's golden parachute. There will be fire and blood in the streets. Please don't do this!

                                                                                                                                      • 5 votes
                                                                                                                                      Reply#25 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:30 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                      dhalgren74

                                                                                                                                      Wait, isn't HP laying off something like 42,000 people? Maybe we need to bail out HP? Come on Paulson, get with the program. Maybe there's a few other industries you'd like to start putting under the government umbrella, like fast food, or hey here's one. . . OIL!

                                                                                                                                      • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                      #25.1 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:46 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                      MRZK.COM

                                                                                                                                      For the corporation, of the corporation and by the corporation shall not perish from this earth...

                                                                                                                                      • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                      #25.2 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:29 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                      Reply
                                                                                                                                      farkedintheusa

                                                                                                                                      Canada is looking good. Real good. Skiing. Health care. No Obama. No tax breaks or bailouts for kids who can't manage their piggy banks.

                                                                                                                                      Sign me up.

                                                                                                                                      • 1 vote
                                                                                                                                      Reply#26 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:30 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                      cyan412000

                                                                                                                                      mexico actually...the mexicans are not using that country anymore they are here

                                                                                                                                      • 6 votes
                                                                                                                                      #26.1 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:33 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                      truth and justice

                                                                                                                                      Stop the madness!!!!!!!!!!!!

                                                                                                                                      • 2 votes
                                                                                                                                      #26.2 - Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:53 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                      BEV_OKC_CITIZEN

                                                                                                                                      BYE BYE =O }

                                                                                                                                      • 2 votes
                                                                                                                                      #26.3 - Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:09 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                      Right of Reagan

                                                                                                                                      When it comes to foriegn policy and lowering taxes Bush/Cheney are spot on, but this socialistic move of actually nationalizing a failing corporation. I don't know where that comes from. It's not Reagnomics its Socialist economics. Of course Pelosi wants to nationalize the auto industry and Obama the medical industry. What is interesting is what do McCain and Palin have to say about this paradigm of socialisist economics? Hey the Latin Americans have nationalized tons of companies over the years, look where it got them. Great model to follow.

                                                                                                                                        #26.4 - Thu Sep 18, 2008 2:49 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                        Reply
                                                                                                                                        Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 ... 20
                                                                                                                                        Leave a Comment:
                                                                                                                                        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                                                                                                        You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                                                                                                                                        (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                                                                                                                                        Newsvine Privacy Statement
                                                                                                                                        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                                                                                                                        FUN STUFF:
                                                                                                                                        • Leaderboard |
                                                                                                                                        • E-Mail Alerts |
                                                                                                                                        • Top of the Vine |
                                                                                                                                        • Newsvine Live |
                                                                                                                                        • Newsvine Archives |
                                                                                                                                        • The Greenhouse |
                                                                                                                                        COMPANY STUFF:
                                                                                                                                        • Code of Honor |
                                                                                                                                        • Company Info |
                                                                                                                                        • Contact Us |
                                                                                                                                        • Jobs |
                                                                                                                                        • User Agreement |
                                                                                                                                        • Privacy Policy |
                                                                                                                                        • About our ads
                                                                                                                                        LEGAL STUFF:
                                                                                                                                        • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                                                                                                                                        • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                                                                                                                                        • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com